Skip to content
 

Wikipedia on “Reptilian Humanoid”

It is a curious thing that Wikipedia, the amateur online encyclopedia, has a reference—in its item sub voce “Reptilian Humanoid”—to Darren Naish’s blogged critique of Who Lies Sleeping?, the book about the intelligent dinosaur (the Anthroposaur) but it does not refer to Who Lies Sleeping? itself. It might be because Wikipedia has rules forbidding “original research”, research considered beyond the scientific pale—ie not peer reviewed and accepted—but obviously has no rules against criticizing such research. It does not seem too fair (Wikipedia editors should read J S Mill On Liberty), but, more importantly, it is scientifically absurd! Indeed it is dogmatism no different from the Church allowing criticism of heresy, but refusing anyone to read anything about heresies themselves except whatever the critics cited for the purpose of refutation! And just adding the appropriate citation is not requiring any contributor to include any inadmissible claims—it is merely showing where the intelligent reader can find them.

Related posts:

  1. Who Lies Sleeping? Impossible to Find—Illogical Contraption Naish calls attention to another, far more obscure book and...
  2. The Dinosauroid: A Humanoid Dinosaur Dale Russell's dinosauroid was a serious scientific speculation, but not...
  3. Who Lies Sleeping? Home Contents and menu of Who Lies Sleeping? The book uses...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Leave a Reply